In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $28 more expensive!
Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $214.99 vs $243.11
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
88%
Price, $
$243.11
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
78%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
