Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1074 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i9-10900X - 289 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $499.88 vs $565.00
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900X - $1.73 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $499.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |