Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 283 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $565.00 vs $621.95
- Up to 11% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.00 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
98%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
89%
Price, $
$621.95
90%
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |