Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900X - 431 vs 423 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $525.00 vs $565.00
- Up to 9% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900X - $1.22 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
431
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$525
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |