Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i9-13900.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900 - 191 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $487.33 vs $499.00
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900 - $2.55 vs $2.68 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$487.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $487.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |