In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Ryzen 9 7900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $266 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 207 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 84% cheaper – $49.00 vs $314.95
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.85/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 55 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 68% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
82%
Price, $
$314.95
15%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
