In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $181 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 79% cheaper – $49.00 vs $229.89
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.24 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
83%
Price, $
$229.89
21%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
