In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Ryzen 7 9700X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $252 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 208 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 84% cheaper – $49.00 vs $301.00
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Ryzen 7 9700X
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
82%
Price, $
$301
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9700X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9700X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
