In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Ryzen 5 7600X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $128 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 23% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 208 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 72% cheaper – $49.00 vs $177.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 55 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
81%
Price, $
$177
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
