In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Ryzen 5 5600G and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $92 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 207 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 65% cheaper – $49.00 vs $141.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Ryzen 5 5600G
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Apr 13, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 5600G: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 5600G
Apr 13th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
83%
Price, $
$141
34%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
28%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 5600G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 5600G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 5600G
Apr 13th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600G Apr 13th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $259.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
