The Celeron 4305UE is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4305UE
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4305UE vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron 4305UE vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4305UE vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4305UE vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4305UE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Vishera |
15 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
