Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 1890 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 63% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G3930T - 153 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Chagall | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |