Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 3198 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8120 - 171 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |