Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $120.0 vs $1150.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.65 vs $6.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |