Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1127 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - 272 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
256
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |