Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1766 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 38% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1820 - 207 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 53 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
150
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |