Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 161 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 1700X - 259 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $195.0 vs $493.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.76 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
40%
Price, $
$493
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $493 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |