Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4440 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $185.0 vs $235.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.58 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
80%
Price, $
$235
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10799 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |