Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 20% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $98.18 vs $250.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74979 minutes ago
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
80.74277854195323%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |