Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $109.99 vs $272.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.32 vs $0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 394 vs 344 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
394
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
46%
Price, $
$272.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |