Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2531 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1820 - 272 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $46.41 vs $261.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.21 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $261.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |