Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon W-2191B on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 807 days newer than Xeon W-2191B.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W-2191B - 176 vs 170 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2191B doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2191B
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 36 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon W-2191B
Server/Workstation • Dec 21st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 21st, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 18 |
| 16 | Threads | 36 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
