Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 949 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 210 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900H - 32 vs 16 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
92%
Value, $/FPS
$2.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |