Buy on Amazon
$325
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2136 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-5820K - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $325.0 vs $429.95
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74322 minutes ago
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
67.0908039329092%
Multi-Core
5443
54.267198404785645%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Matisse | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
