Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 194 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5800H - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Cezanne | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
