Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $186.0 vs $512.96
- Up to 50% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-14900F - $0.91 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 37% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 2700X - 281 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
205
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$186
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
50%
Price, $
$512.96
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |