Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $177.2 vs $529.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-14900F - $0.81 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i5-12600K - 233 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 32 vs 16 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
220
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$177.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $177.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10671 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
35%
Price, $
$529.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |