Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2134 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $195.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900F - $1.24 vs $1.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 72% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 1700 - 270 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 32 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6526 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |