Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 26% better in New World than Core i9-10900F - 153 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $250.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900F - $2.07 vs $2.84 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
121
79%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |