Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 7 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U - 592 vs 545 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U - 20 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |