Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - 212 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $207.99 vs $225.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - $0.98 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$207.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $207.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |