Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 1098 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930T - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |