Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 588 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - $39.9 vs $120.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 5 1600 - $0.22 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6150 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
178
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |