Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 1000 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3930 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $88.0 vs $150.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $0.46 vs $0.75 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
61.33333333333334%
Price, $
$150.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
94.55445544554455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.172413793103445%
Multi-Core
1043
33.8856400259909%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |