Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4300U is 1946 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Performs up to 10% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 174 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 20 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 4300U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
