Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 642 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 275 vs 260 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
