Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 729 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 3 3250U - 124 vs 118 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |