Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200U is 2643 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8120 - 252 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |