Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 1903 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than FX-4300 - 167 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |