Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 4417 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $19.95 vs $415.77
- Up to 94% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-10900 - $0.26 vs $4.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 20% better in Remnant II than Phenom X4 9650 - 91 vs 76 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
76
83.51648351648352%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.57/FPS
5.689277899343545%
Price, $
$415.77
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for $415.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
13.96713615023474%
Multi-Core
765
9.084431777698612%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |