Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4160 - 429 vs 398 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $11.48 vs $429.99
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $429.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
62.441314553990615%
Multi-Core
2072
24.60515378221114%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |