Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 700 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 28% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $254.12 vs $352.36
- Up to 94% better value when playing Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $0.08 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4160 - 249 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
245
98.39357429718876%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
5.633802816901409%
Price, $
$352.36
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.7075873827792%
Multi-Core
2072
30.80582812964615%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |