Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 27% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G550 - 193 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $19.59 vs $273.11
- Up to 91% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900 - $0.13 vs $1.42 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $273.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
152
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |