Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G550 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G550 is 1527 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Phenom X4 9650 - 90 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Phenom X4 9650 - $19.59 vs $19.95
- Up to 4% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Phenom X4 9650 - $0.22 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
88
97.77777777777777%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
95.65217391304347%
Price, $
$19.95
98%
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |