Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700T outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700T is 4044 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700T
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9650 - 127 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i7-9700T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
