Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 4417 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $19.95 vs $389.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-10700K - $0.12 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom X4 9650 - 180 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
164
91.11111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
5.529953917050691%
Price, $
$389.95
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
13.95076201641266%
Multi-Core
765
9.39572586588062%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |