Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $39.99 vs $219.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-12700F - $0.2 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 35% better in Sea of Thieves than Phenom X4 9650 - 265 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
197
74.33962264150942%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2028 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
265
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
24.096385542168676%
Price, $
$219.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.076206604572397%
Multi-Core
765
6.63659234839941%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |