Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4737 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9650 - 193 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |