Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 3815 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 43% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $39.99 vs $69.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Athlon 200GE - $0.18 vs $0.31 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 228 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
219
96.05263157894737%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3646 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
58.06451612903225%
Price, $
$69.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
26.77165354330709%
Multi-Core
765
41.19547657512116%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
Agena | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |