Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 3454 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $189.95 vs $547.2
- Up to 65% better value when playing Control than Core i9-7920X - $0.96 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Phenom X4 9550 - 202 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 24 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
198
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for $547.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |